transparent_unions
The tracking issue for this feature is #60405
The transparent_unions
feature allows you mark union
s as
#[repr(transparent)]
. A union
may be #[repr(transparent)]
in exactly the
same conditions in which a struct
may be #[repr(transparent)]
(generally,
this means the union
must have exactly one non-zero-sized field). Some
concrete illustrations follow.
#![allow(unused)] #![feature(transparent_unions)] fn main() { // This union has the same representation as `f32`. #[repr(transparent)] union SingleFieldUnion { field: f32, } // This union has the same representation as `usize`. #[repr(transparent)] union MultiFieldUnion { field: usize, nothing: (), } }
For consistency with transparent struct
s, union
s must have exactly one
non-zero-sized field. If all fields are zero-sized, the union
must not be
#[repr(transparent)]
:
#![allow(unused)] #![feature(transparent_unions)] fn main() { // This (non-transparent) union is already valid in stable Rust: pub union GoodUnion { pub nothing: (), } // Error: transparent union needs exactly one non-zero-sized field, but has 0 // #[repr(transparent)] // pub union BadUnion { // pub nothing: (), // } }
The one exception is if the union
is generic over T
and has a field of type
T
, it may be #[repr(transparent)]
even if T
is a zero-sized type:
#![allow(unused)] #![feature(transparent_unions)] fn main() { // This union has the same representation as `T`. #[repr(transparent)] pub union GenericUnion<T: Copy> { // Unions with non-`Copy` fields are unstable. pub field: T, pub nothing: (), } // This is okay even though `()` is a zero-sized type. pub const THIS_IS_OKAY: GenericUnion<()> = GenericUnion { field: () }; }
Like transparent struct
s, a transparent union
of type U
has the same
layout, size, and ABI as its single non-ZST field. If it is generic over a type
T
, and all its fields are ZSTs except for exactly one field of type T
, then
it has the same layout and ABI as T
(even if T
is a ZST when monomorphized).
Like transparent struct
s, transparent union
s are FFI-safe if and only if
their underlying representation type is also FFI-safe.
A union
may not be eligible for the same nonnull-style optimizations that a
struct
or enum
(with the same fields) are eligible for. Adding
#[repr(transparent)]
to union
does not change this. To give a more concrete
example, it is unspecified whether size_of::<T>()
is equal to
size_of::<Option<T>>()
, where T
is a union
(regardless of whether or not
it is transparent). The Rust compiler is free to perform this optimization if
possible, but is not required to, and different compiler versions may differ in
their application of these optimizations.